|
Court Rules and Statutes
Outline of the Uniform Mediation Act - Illinois P.
A. 93-0399
There is a privilege for a "mediation communication"
[a statement, whether oral or in a record or verbal or nonverbal, that
occurs during a mediation or is made for purposes of considering, conducting,
participating in, initiating, continuing, or reconvening a mediation or
retaining a mediator]. (Sec. 4)
The Act applies to any of the mediations in which the mediation parties:
- Are required to mediate or are referred to mediation by statute or
rule or by a court or agency.
- And the mediator agree to mediate in a record that indicates
that mediation communications will be privileged against disclosure.
- Use as a mediator a person who holds himself or herself out as a
mediator. (Sec. 3 (a))
The Act does not apply to a mediation:
- That relates to a collective bargaining agreement.
- Conducted by a judge who might make a ruling on the case.
- Conducted under the auspices of a primary or secondary school if
all parties are students; or a correctional institution for youths if
all parties are residents of it. (Sec. 3(b))
In a proceeding, the following privileges apply:
- A mediation party may refuse to disclose, and may prevent
any other person from disclosing, a mediation communication.
- A mediator may refuse to disclose a mediation communication,
and may prevent any other person from disclosing a mediation communication
of the mediator.
- A nonpartv participant may refuse to disclose, and may prevent
any other person from disclosing, a mediation communication of the nonparty
participant. (Sec. 4)
The above privileges may be expressly waived by all parties to the
mediation and:
- It is expressly waived by (a) the mediator or (b) a nonparty participant,
depending on whose privilege it is. (Sec. 5)
- The parties agree in advance in a signed record or a record of proceeding
that reflects agreement by the parties, that all or part of a mediation
is not privileged. (Sec. 3(c))
A person is precluded from asserting a privilege:
- If the person makes a representation about a mediation communication
which prejudices another person in a proceeding, but only to the extent
necessary for the person prejudiced to respond to the representation
or disclosure.
- If the person intentionally uses a mediation to plan, attempt to
commit or commit a crime, or to conceal an ongoing crime or ongoing
criminal activity. (Sec. 5 (b) and (c))
There is no privilege for a mediation communication that is:
- The agreement evidenced by a record signed by all parties to the
agreement; (i.e., the agreement reached in mediation)
- Available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act or made
during a session that is required by law to be open to the public;
- A threat or statement of a plan to inflict bodily injury or commit
a crime of violence or intentionally used to plan, attempt to commit,
or to conceal an ongoing crime or ongoing criminal activity;
- To prove or disprove a claim or complaint of professional misconduct
or malpractice filed against a mediator, mediation party, nonparty participant,
or representative of a party based on conduct occurring during a mediation;
or
- To prove or disprove abuse, neglect, abandonment, or exploitation
in a proceeding in which a child or adult protective services agency
is a party, unless the case is referred by a court to mediation and
a public agency participates. (Sec. 6)
There is no privilege for a mediation communication under Sec. 4 if
a court, administrative agency or arbitrator finds:
- After a hearing in camera
- The party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence shows
- That the evidence is not otherwise available
- And that there is a need for the evidence that substantially outweighs
the interest in protecting confidentiality
- And that the mediation communication is sought in
- A felony
- A proceeding to prove a claim to rescind or reform or a defense
to avoid liability on a contract arising out of the mediation.
(Sec. 6 (b))
- Even if all of the above is found, the mediator may not be compelled
to testify regarding claims regarding misconduct or malpractice of a
party or representative of a party or regarding the contract. (Sec.
6 (c))
Evidence or information that is otherwise admissible or subject to
discovery does not become inadmissible or protected from discovery solely
by reason of its disclosure or use in a mediation. (Sec. 4 (c))
In a report, a mediator may disclose only:
- Whether the mediation occurred or has terminated, whether a settlement
was reached, and attendance;
- A mediation communication evidencing abuse, neglect, abandonment,
or exploitation of an individual to an appropriate public agency;
- A mediation communication not barred by this Act. (Sec. 7)
Confidentiality: Unless subject to the Open Meetings Act or the
Freedom of Information Act, mediation communications are confidential
to the extent agreed by the parties or provided by other law or rule of
this State. (Sec. 8)
Mediator's disclosure of conflicts of interest; background:
- Before accepting a mediation, a person requested to serve as a mediator
must make a reasonable inquiry to determine whether there are any known
facts or relationships that might affect the impartiality of the mediator
and must disclose these to the mediation parties as soon as is practical
before accepting a mediation.
- If a mediator learns a fact after accepting a mediation, [s]he must
disclose it as soon as is practicable.
- A mediation party may request and the mediator must disclose his
or her qualifications.
- This Act does not require a mediator to have any particular profession
or background.
- Unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties or necessary, a mediator
must be impartial. (Sec. 9)
Participation in mediation: An attorney or other individual designated
by a party may accompany the party to and participate in a mediation.
A waiver of participation given before the mediation may be rescinded.
(Sec. 10)
Act effective January 2004.
Outline prepared by Roberta Fertel, J.D. '03, and Suzanne Schmitz.
This outline should not substitute for your reading of the act and your
attention to cases interpreting the Act.
|